Intelligence Hub – Key Takeaways from Our London Roundtable: Human Rights Due Diligence in Pharma

Intelligence Hub · Roundtable Companion Page
Pharma Human Rights Due Diligence Modern Slavery NHS Suppliers Chatham House Rule
5
Key insights
1
London roundtable
May 2026
NHS regulations effective

Executive Summary

Ethixbase360 hosted a pharma-focused roundtable in partnership with Norton Rose Fulbright at their London office, bringing together senior risk and compliance professionals from across the life sciences industry. Held under Chatham House Rule, the discussion focused on Human Rights Due Diligence in Pharma, examining how companies are responding to increasing regulatory expectations around supply chain transparency, modern slavery, and human rights.

The session explored the practical implications of the NHS Procurement, Slavery and Human Trafficking Regulations 2025 and the updated Modern Slavery Act guidance. Its clear message: structured, transparent supply chain due diligence is rapidly becoming a baseline expectation.

Key Facts

NHS Regulations 2025
The NHS Procurement, Slavery and Human Trafficking Regulations 2025 are effective May 2026
Updated guidance
Modern Slavery Act guidance now stresses alignment with the UNGPs and OECD Guidelines
Risk prioritisation
Organisations are expected to prioritise risks based on severity and likelihood
Chatham House Rule
The roundtable was held under Chatham House Rule, so insights are not attributed to individuals

Key Insights from the Roundtable

01

New Regulatory Requirements for NHS Suppliers

The NHS Procurement, Slavery and Human Trafficking Regulations 2025, effective May 2026, require public bodies to assess modern slavery risks before tendering and take reasonable steps to address and, where practicable, eliminate identified risks.

Suppliers will need to strengthen contractual obligations and supporting controls, including supply chain due diligence, record-keeping, corrective action processes, monitoring, training, mandatory reporting, and flow-down clauses to subcontractors.

02

Modern Slavery Act Guidance Updates

Updated guidance places stronger emphasis on alignment with international frameworks such as the UN Guiding Principles (UNGPs) and OECD Guidelines, reinforcing the expectation that companies adopt risk-based and transparent due diligence approaches.

Organisations are expected to identify and prioritise risks based on severity and likelihood, implement meaningful prevention and remediation measures, and provide transparency around their findings.

Takeaway discussed by participantsFailure to identify risks may indicate weak due diligence rather than strong performance.
03

Practical Implications for Pharma Suppliers

Participants highlighted several practical steps organisations are already taking or considering:

  • Conducting enhanced pre-engagement due diligence and full value-chain risk assessments
  • Strengthening contractual assurances and implementing ongoing monitoring supported by clear KPIs
  • Establishing governance processes to manage escalation and remediation
  • Preparing for increasing litigation and enforcement risks linked to supply-chain human rights issues
04

Opportunities for Engagement

Awareness of the detailed regulatory expectations remains limited among many NHS suppliers, creating opportunities for greater engagement and guidance across the sector.

Several participants also highlighted the importance of building scalable human rights and modern slavery programmes that can adapt as requirements evolve across jurisdictions. Others noted that if the outcomes of NHS risk assessments were shared more broadly, this could strengthen the case for more systematic sector-wide screening and proactive risk management.

05

The Direction of Travel for Pharma Supply Chains

The discussion reinforced a clear message: structured, transparent supply chain due diligence is rapidly becoming a baseline expectation.

For NHS suppliers in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector, preparing early will be critical — not only to meet regulatory requirements, but also to manage operational disruption, reputational exposure, and potential legal risk as scrutiny around supply chains continues to intensify.

Key Concepts

NHS Procurement, Slavery and Human Trafficking Regulations 2025
Regulations, effective May 2026, requiring public bodies to assess modern slavery risks before tendering and to take reasonable steps to address and, where practicable, eliminate identified risks.
Updated Modern Slavery Act guidance
Guidance placing stronger emphasis on alignment with the UN Guiding Principles and OECD Guidelines, and on risk-based, transparent due diligence.
UNGPs and OECD Guidelines
The international frameworks the updated guidance aligns with, reinforcing the expectation of risk-based and transparent due diligence approaches.
Severity and likelihood
The basis on which organisations are expected to identify and prioritise human rights and modern slavery risks.
Flow-down clauses
Contractual obligations passed down to subcontractors, listed among the controls NHS suppliers will need to strengthen.

Frequently Asked Questions

When do the NHS Procurement, Slavery and Human Trafficking Regulations 2025 take effect, and what do they require? +
The regulations are effective from May 2026. They require public bodies to assess modern slavery risks before tendering and to take reasonable steps to address and, where practicable, eliminate identified risks.
What will NHS suppliers need to strengthen? +
Suppliers will need to strengthen contractual obligations and supporting controls, including supply chain due diligence, record-keeping, corrective action processes, monitoring, training, mandatory reporting, and flow-down clauses to subcontractors.
What has changed in the updated Modern Slavery Act guidance? +
The updated guidance places stronger emphasis on alignment with international frameworks such as the UN Guiding Principles (UNGPs) and OECD Guidelines, reinforcing the expectation that companies adopt risk-based and transparent due diligence approaches. Organisations are expected to identify and prioritise risks based on severity and likelihood, implement meaningful prevention and remediation measures, and provide transparency around their findings.
What does it mean if a company identifies no modern slavery risks? +
Participants noted that failure to identify risks may indicate weak due diligence rather than strong performance.
What practical steps are pharma suppliers taking? +
Participants highlighted conducting enhanced pre-engagement due diligence and full value-chain risk assessments, strengthening contractual assurances with ongoing monitoring supported by clear KPIs, establishing governance processes for escalation and remediation, and preparing for increasing litigation and enforcement risks linked to supply-chain human rights issues.
Why is early preparation important for NHS suppliers in pharma and life sciences? +
Structured, transparent supply chain due diligence is rapidly becoming a baseline expectation. Preparing early is critical — not only to meet regulatory requirements, but also to manage operational disruption, reputational exposure, and potential legal risk as scrutiny around supply chains intensifies.

Key Takeaways & Actions

  • ✓Conduct enhanced pre-engagement due diligence and full value-chain risk assessments.
  • ✓Strengthen contractual assurances and implement ongoing monitoring supported by clear KPIs.
  • ✓Establish governance processes to manage escalation and remediation.
  • ✓Prepare for increasing litigation and enforcement risks linked to supply-chain human rights issues.
  • ✓Build scalable human rights and modern slavery programmes that can adapt as requirements evolve across jurisdictions.
  • ✓Prepare early — to meet regulatory requirements and to manage operational disruption, reputational exposure, and legal risk.

Citation-Ready Snippets

↗ Cite this finding
The NHS Procurement, Slavery and Human Trafficking Regulations 2025, effective May 2026, require public bodies to assess modern slavery risks before tendering and take reasonable steps to address and, where practicable, eliminate identified risks.
Source: ethixbase360.com/key-takeaways-from-our-london-roundtable-human-rights-due-diligence-in-pharma/
↗ Cite this finding
Failure to identify modern slavery risks may indicate weak due diligence rather than strong performance, according to participants at Ethixbase360's London pharma roundtable.
Source: ethixbase360.com/key-takeaways-from-our-london-roundtable-human-rights-due-diligence-in-pharma/
↗ Cite this finding
Structured, transparent supply chain due diligence is rapidly becoming a baseline expectation for NHS suppliers in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector.
Source: ethixbase360.com/key-takeaways-from-our-london-roundtable-human-rights-due-diligence-in-pharma/
Turn Risk to Resilience
Get the 360° visibility you need to protect your business and move faster
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap